This was supposed to work, but it doesn't. The connection wait by setting the read wait limit. This using setsockopt() and it doesn't work on Linux to try to reduce If you want to put a limit on the connection attempt, FWIW I looked at If it waited less long, it would continue toĭo the iterative retry through the dns results behaviour. That number) and our overall connection timeout is 20s, you get oneĬhance and this behaviour. If the single connection attempt wants to sit there 30s (the OS chooses > Why not try next instead of attempting time out ? Is there some way > 5_1.rtc_ is our internal domain for test. > until the connection attempt times out. > If lws (or anything else) tries to connect there, it just sits there > From here 5.5.5.5 routes to Telefonica and then goes in a blackhole. 主题: Re: 答复: A question about libwebsockets dns resolve and newest tag 收件人: "huangkaicheng" " libwebsockets at ml." please help to check my code whether there is something wrong. but this is something wrong that tsi fds count is 1. We want to limit wait time for each when dns resolve connect because 20s is too long. Next message (by thread): 回复: 答复: A question about libwebsockets dns resolve.Previous message (by thread): What is the correct way to close a WS client connection?.回复: 答复: A question about libwebsockets dns resolve o_O凌雲 550470999 at qq.com 回复: 答复: A question about libwebsockets dns resolve
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |